Category: Issues & Conflicts

  • Back To Normal

    What We Need

    What we need, they said, is to get “back to normal.”

    As I write this, we’re well into the fourth or fifth “wave” of COVID-19 infections, depending on who’s counting and how. Deaths are on the rise again in many states in spite of increased vaccination.

    A few days ago a young black man, Daunte Wright, was shot and killed by a police officer over yet another vague insinuation about registration tags or air fresheners or something, literally a few miles down the road from the ongoing trial of Derek Chauvin, the police officer who killed George Floyd. People are protesting nationwide, with the attendent arrests and further abuses of police power that we’ve come to expect here in the “land of the free.”

    Our love affair with mass public shootings got off to a high-energy restart in March, when a man who later blamed “sex addiction” went on a killing spree targeting Asian-American women in massage parlors. Since then there have already been so many public shooting incidents I’ve lost track, and it’s only the fifteenth of April.

    It looks like normal is exactly what we’ve gotten back to, and just like the normal we left behind when COVID started, it sucks. Millions unemployed or underemployed for no reason other than that it’s profitable for a handful of oligarchs. Millions without reliable or even meaningful access to health care for no reason other than that it’s profitable for a handful of oligarchs. Millions without access to education, and much of the education they can access deliberately distorted, for no reason than that it’s profitable for a handful of oligarchs.

    A nearly extinct middle class. The death of popular leisure. The rise of profit-based humanity, when what you “deserve” as a human being depends entirely on how much profit you’re willing to generate for a handful of oligarchs. It’s hilarious and terrifying to me that just in my lifetime we’ve gone from glorifying the dream of a day when nobody needed to work, to vilifying the idea that any decent person would ever want to do anything but work.

    Racism. Sexism and other gender-based bigotry. And of course, always, classism…except some of y’all who thought you were “us” have found out the hard way over the last year or so that you’re “them” just like I am, so now what?

    Now What?

    alex-jones-cap-crop-rogan-youtube
    Pictured: “Normal” – via YouTube

    Apparently for some folks “now what” is “desperately scramble back to the crap we used to put up with, because at least that was predictable and safe.” You may hear me looking down my nose at you but I’m not; I understand better than you think.

    You see, this is a common thinking pattern in codependency – families and loved ones of people who are addicts. The drunk or junkie gets sober and then of all things you, the codependent, find yourself thinking like “well jeez at least when he was drunk all the time I knew how to deal with him.” Nuts, but also very real. I lived through it; I know. Was way easier to lift five bucks off the old man when he was passed out.

    So I get it. I also get that it doesn’t work and never did and we have to set that nonsense aside now. We’re evolving – in real time, at high speed, and we’re watching ourselves do it and can make choices about how it happens… and into what we finally evolve.

    We have to reject these self-serving hypocrisies that we’ve so fallen in love with. We just love to be the heroes in our own movie, but we rarely stop to think that maybe we’re the bad guy…and the unfortunate reality is we are the bad guy far more often than we like to believe. Not only are we the bad guy, but a lot of what we’ve been taught to believe was good about us is bovine excrement. The taming of the wild land and noble savage by the educated European; the grand and sweeping reforms of democracy that were for white, land-owning men only; the common defense that defended the wealthy with the lives of the poor.

    We’ve been coming to terms with that for a minute now, especially for the last fifty-five years or so, since the great cultural revolutions of the 1960’s. Unfortunately some of the terms we’ve come to may be as misguided as those we’re rejecting. Wide-eyed credulity has been supplanted by bitter, arrogant cynicism; is that an improvement? We continue to think of our democratically elected governments in “us v. them” terms, and in so doing continue to fail to understand our role both in our government and in our society; we continue to look for someone or something to blame rather than working to solve the problem we’re complaining about. We engage in empty, performative gestures, but then when someone is sincere we doubt and discredit them.

    I’ve talked about this in my own field as well, right? The audience clamors for authenticity but not without ten thousand dollars worth of studio effects on it. We want informed and passionate advocates for justice, but then we give all the airspace to the same fifteen voices working for the same six companies that we always have…unless we want to look smart, then we go off the rails and end up in Alex Jones land.

    What about any of this merits any rush to get “back to?”

    The Reality At Hand

    brown mountains
    Photo by Roberto Nickson on Pexels.com

    The reality at hand is, simply put, what I’ve been saying all along: we’re evolving. That kind of behavior, all that hypocrisy and self-contradiction for the sake of upholding a public image that probably isn’t as great as we think it is to begin with, all of that doing one thing behind closed doors and saying something else out in public…it’s all going away.

    What we are facing is the stark and inescapable truth that these behaviors work in opposition to the “universal ethic,” i.e. the survival and propagation of the species. It does not promote sustainability to continue turning a blind eye to human rights abuses. It does not help preserve and expand the species for us to continue deliberately making life a start to finish terror for huge segments of the population.

    It doesn’t serve the universal ethic to invent all these labor-saving devices and then refuse to stop wasting our labor because that’s the habit we’re in and we’ve come to believe it’s the only way to do things.

    It doesn’t serve the universal ethic to keep the vast majority of the population subjugated, even if you can con a big chunk of them into being happy about it.

    As we’ve discussed previously, anything that doesn’t serve the universal ethic is, eventually, rejected by life itself as contrary to its purposes. This broken, purposeless “normality” to which we’re all in such a hurry to return because we’re exhausted and confused and scared and feel unstable and vulnerable in the face of COVID-19 simply does not serve and must therefore be rejected.

    Right now is the time, folks. This is the moment many of us, and indeed many in generations long past, have waited for. Right now it’s in our hands to shape the future. We have that power, you and me, together. The more together we are, the more power we have, and the more power we have the more effectively we can push back against those whose behavior and ideology are hostile to the survival and propagation of the species.

    It was always us, man. Not the big rich folks. It’s always been us – “the people.” “Little folks” like you and me looking around and saying to ourselves “no, there’s got to be a better way.” That one simple thought has been the impetus for every advancement in human life since some fifteen-foot-long pre-Cambrian mudskipper decided it was easier to walk over the dry spots than to swim around, and also there’s food up there.

    A Better Way

    Zack de la Rocha, 2016 publicity photo by Juan Luis Garcia via Billboard.Com

    There is a better way, and we can nearly all see it now. The democratizing of information that has come with the information age has made the structures that protected old entrenched power structures impossible to maintain. It’s too easy to see through now. Religion is dying. Even as we cry out internally for those connections and exchanges of power and energy that are often lumped into “mysticism” simply because we haven’t yet understood their science, we are actively rejecting the superficial substitutes for those connections and exchanges. We’re stripping away all the barnacles and remembering what’s supposed to be so great about all this in the first place.

    It is a fascinating and exciting time to be alive. I absolutely believe that the things we’ve done in the last 70-80 years, and the things we’ll do in the next 30-50, will define everything about our species for at least the next five centuries.

    Philosopher and poet Zack de la Rocha once posed this thought:

    It has to start somewhere, it has to start sometime;
    What better place than here? What better time than now?

    Rage Against The Machine, Guerilla Radio

    It’s here, it’s now, and it’s time. A revolution not of arms and battles and the same stupid pointless escalations, but of mind and spirit, an internal revolution that begins, as all true revolutions must, in the mirror of the prospective revolutionary. We’re going to have to get used to the idea that “a job” isn’t gonna be a thing here in another few decades. We’re going to have to lose this ego-driven aversion to the “welfare state,” because the reality is that’s all any state ever is or can be, if it’s to be a state at all. We’re going to have to stop allowing ourselves to be taken in by euphemism and double-talk, without losing the art and beauty of capricious language.

    We’re going to have to stop bullshitting ourselves about who we are, and why, and what it all means, and what we’re going to do about it all, because this crap of hiding under our desks and ignoring the elephant in the living room and whistling past the graveyard and pick your metaphor is done. No, it’s not all magically disappeared, but it’s fading away very quickly now. We are literally growing out of who we’ve always been; I call it an evolution. If you’re a pedant and a biologist you might prefer to say that homo sapiens sapiens is perhaps entering its adolescence or adulthood as a species.

    However you put it, whatever way you need to frame it to make it something you can internalize, find it. Because this is the reality we’re in, your moment is now, and the fate of the world really is in your – our – hands.

    Thanks for reading, please be sure to follow and share JH using the social media icons scattered throughout the site!

  • Not All Men

    So this is one of those things that I’ve been grinding my teeth about for a long time, and I’ve said all of this before many, many times but I feel like it bears posting and keeping at hand:

    Anyone whose response to any conversation about the sexual aggression, exploitation, abuse, harassment, and assault is “Not All Men!” needs to sit down, shut up, and not speak again until you’ve learned how to act like a decent human being.

    Let me tell y’all “not all men” types a little secret that’s only a secret to you:

    ALL women – ALL women, every single woman you have ever known – has personally experienced sexual aggression, exploitation, or assault at the hands or words or eyes of a man in her lifetime, and most of them have experienced it within the last five years statistically. ALL women, everywhere, including those so normalized to it that they themselves don’t realize that’s what’s happening.

    Not just in “those countries” or “those states” or “that part of the whatever” or “those people.” ALL women. Every. Single. One. And I don’t have to ask them all; I’ll concede that if there’s a woman someplace who has never once in her life been in the presence of a man who knew she was female, then maybe she has escaped that experience.

    I am telling you if you’re a man and you think I’m making that up, it’s straight up because the women around you think you at least might be, maybe, sometimes, part of the problem, if in nothing else than at least in being so obviously averse to dealing with realities you don’t like that people who love you avoid presenting you with them.

    You probably need to deal with that internally before you go rushing to her to ask if I’m right.

    TOO MANY MEN, which means “MORE THAN ONE,” engage in sexual aggression, exploitation, or assault against women, and until the number of men engaging in sexual aggression, exploitation, or assault against women is ZERO, the phrase “not all men” simply need not exist.

    It is a defense purely of the male ego, almost universally offered by men who feel guilty about their own behavior but not guilty enough to sit down, shut up, and look within themselves for the keys to change it rather than just making the same empty noises as they wheedle for social approval with performative blather.

    If you’re not one of those men and you’re saying that crap, the problem is not that you aren’t one of those men, it’s that in the very act of thinking now’s the time to say so you are much farther on your way to becoming one of them than you apparently believe yourself to be.

    Thanks for coming to my TED talk, I’ve been John Henry.

  • Drugs, Sex, and Rock & Roll

    [embedyt] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jNt7ZGCW-o[/embedyt]

    The Problem

    Sweet’s “Fox On The Run.”  Perhaps the distilled essence of what we now call variously “glitter rock” or “glam rock” or “power pop.”

    Another great song that’s gonna get canceled as soon as the “woke” folk read the lyrics.  You can find ’em yourself if you want, but allow me to summarize:

    “[verse 1 & 2]Hi, I’m a rock star.  Yes, you’re a female indicating you want to have sex with me, or at least you’re a female in my general vicinity and that’s close enough because it’s 1974 and we still think “leaving the house” constitutes consent.  From a distance in the dark, you appeared to be a female of legal age to have sex (note well:  that’s not 18, this is a UK band from the 70’s; “underage” is 15 and under, not 17), but now that you’re up close you’re clearly too young and [chorus] you have to go.  [Verse 3 & 4]  Hi, it’s years later and I’m still a rock star.  You’re still a female and you are again indicating you want to have sex with me.  I remember you from when you were too young, but now you’re old enough and you’ve clearly been around a bit and had some fun…and I liked you better the other way, that is to say ‘innocent,’ that is to say ‘underage.’  [Chorus] Bye, Felicia.”

    So let’s take this one thing at a time.  First, I think it’s about time we had a clear, open, and straightforward conversation about sex in popular culture.  That conversation goes like this:

    FFS, people. POPULAR MUSIC IS ABOUT SEX. GETTING LAID. DOING NAUGHTY THINGS. BREAKING RULES. DOING THE NASTY. ROCKING. AND. ROLLING.  Even when it’s not, it is.

    I’m so, so, so, SOOOOOOOOOOO sick of living in a culture where we all pretend very loudly to hate sex on social media and in public, where we all act like nobody’s got any kinks or hangups, and absolutely every single person waited until they were a happily married adult before engaging in sexual congress for the purposes of procreation only, when we all know better and just don’t admit it.

    THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU LET MRS. GRUNDY MAKE THE RULES.

    Everybody lies about sex.

    It’s bullshit. Just another facet of that same old big picture where some old white guy goes ‘NO’ and we all go “hhhokay” and from now on that’s the rule and we all have to cooperate with it (or pretend to) on pain of shunning. BULLSHIT.

    You know what else? If you DON’T like sex THAT’S FINE TOO. You don’t HAVE to. Those of us who do might feel like maybe you’re missing out, but in the end it’s your business and nobody else’s.  There are WAY more than enough folks who are into it procreationally to cheerfully accommodate and fully staff a population of those who are into it more recreationally, or not at all!

    And guess what? As long as we’re not putting our hands on anyone who can’t give or hasn’t given informed consent for our hands to be on them, it’s FINE. It’s all FINE. And we nearly all do it. The very fact of something being forbidden or taboo or socially risky is commonly what tends to turn people on about it; I’m telling you, we’re not as different as we think we are and you’re probably not nearly as big a pervert as you think, relatively speaking.

    Feathers vs. Chickens

    With that in mind it’s not unreasonable to say every damned single one of us has SOME kind of kink. All a kink is, is something that you find sexually pleasurable that, generally speaking, falls outside the range of “strictly one man, one woman, missionary position, no funny talk or spank and tickle.”  Your kink might be oral once a year, that guy over there’s kink might be the only way he can really enjoy himself is with six Armenian jugglers.  Long as he can find six Armenian jugglers who consent, I fail to see any problem with that at all.

    That’s where the term “vanilla” as used in communities related to kink comes from – because some folks like vanilla ice cream, and some folks like rocky road or black cherry or mint chocolate chip.  Some folks might like them all on alternating days, or at the same time, and as long as the ice cream is cool with it, it’s all good.

    And some folks might not like ice cream at all and that’s cool too.

    Heck, your kink might be simply the wonderful feeling you get from being intimate with someone you love.  Destigmatize that word “kink” in your head a bit, it’ll do you good.

    We have seen incredible growth in our understanding of human dignity and interpersonal respect, in my lifetime.  Things I did in my twenties I wouldn’t do if I was twenty now, because back then we didn’t really know the less egregious stuff was as bad as it manifestly proved to be.  That’s good change – that’s GREAT if you are (or present as) female.

    But it sucks if you really are just a person who was part of the context of groupies and nobody’s checking ID’s at the afterparty and all that stuff, never set out to hurt anyone, never got pushy or shitty with someone when you got told no, didn’t take advantage of anyone when they were passed out or otherwise so incapacitated as to be unable to give meaningful consent, did your best to be respectful and decent, and twenty, thirty, thirty-five years later you’re supposed to feel like an asshole because you *should have* known in 1991 that when a woman walks up to you and offers you free drugs and sex after a gig, she’s probably got serious issues and may need immediate help.

    No, in 1991 the expected and entirely common response to that situation was “let’s party,” and frankly I think it’s well worth discussing it with the participants of the time on the “female side” of that conversation before we go assuming all or even most of them feel or in fact were abused, exploited, or assaulted.

    Kill Your Idols

    The simple reality is that not all our heroes are all we wish they were, and we’re coming to grips with that.  We haven’t yet developed a clear and consistent standard to retroactively apply – what Kevin Spacey did was a million miles away from what Al Franken did…but they both paid the same price, didn’t they?  Because Spacey was an active predator whose behavior wasn’t even acceptable under the morals of the time and place it happened, whereas Franken is guilty of incredibly tangential and minor involvement in a bit of ribald humor typical of its time and place, and has expressed regret and even self-loathing at the idea that he participated in anything that genuinely hurt anyone.  It was “all in fun,” and in that time and place there wasn’t anything abnormal or really even mildly offensive about it, as evidenced by the clear and unmitigated enthusiasm and fun being had by the woman Franken’s accused of sexually assaulting visible in the tape of the incident.

    I think these errors of scope and scale, the refined discernment that truly must become a part of this process of recursively examining our past in the every-increasing light of new knowledge and wisdom, will sort themselves out in time.

    I just hope we can remember how to enjoy an old pop song with a good hook – and this one’s on the same heap as “You’re Sixteen” and “Only Sixteen” and all of the other work, in many cases full of beauty and talent, that stands as an uncomfortable and inconvenient reminder of the reality that as recently as thirty years ago it was still socially acceptable enough for a thirty year man to write a song about having the hots for a minor to have it become a hit.

    There’s nothing wrong with taking a critical look, just like there’s nothing wrong with taking a critical look at Twain’s use of the n-word in his writing.

    Unintended Consequences

    There is something wrong with pretending that stuff never happened or even that it doesn’t still constitute aesthetically pleasing art of its type.  Not only all of the sort of liberal and sex-positive things I’ve already outlined, but there’s one more much more ominous facet to all of this sweeping under rugs of dirty little secrets:

    It gives cover to predators.

    It drives people who engage in “non-vanilla” but still entirely legal behavior further into the shadows, where it becomes harder for communities to self-police and social stigma makes it much more difficult to prosecute active sexual predators.  Victims of abuse are already afraid to come forward because they’re like to be kink shamed and maybe even arrested by police, especially in same-sex situations because bigotry.

    Making everyone who’s a little kinky feel like Ted Bundy doesn’t solve any problem and makes it much easier for the real Ted Bundys of the world to do their damage, and that’s the end result of all this pearl-clutching.  Making it impossible to talk about sex doesn’t protect anyone, or at least not from much or for long.

    So definitely, hold people responsible.  Let’s not have Gary Glitter raking in millions in royalties from US sports broadcasts after being convicted multiple times of active and predatory pedophilia.  Let’s not just keep on with the “boys will be boys” crap.

    But let’s also make sure we’re keeping a fair and reasoned perspective.  No matter how many enlightened individuals there are, there simply is no reason to fault a person in 1955 for accepting as normal that his wife wasn’t allowed to get credit without his permission, because it was normal back then.  Many of those present at the time fought and even died to help secure the rights and privileges we’re now trying to retroactively condemn them for not supporting.

    Credit Where It’s Due

    It is in fact the very considerations of that guy in 1955, Mr. Joe Slightly-More-Progressive-Than-Average, asking himself whether that normality was really fair that advanced the conversation far enough that you can look back at him in condescension now.  The same’s true of the stuff I’m talking about above; those of us who were “on the ground” so to speak were the ones who by and large explored and defined and brought to life these new ways of understanding, new boundaries, new rules of respectful communication.

    We fought, hard, not just in public rhetoric but in our own heads to resolve that cognitive dissonance between our norms and our values, and to adjust our behavior and make it acceptable.  Sure, not all of us were on board, and not everyone who’s 21 is free from bigotry and sexual aggression now, either, but we – particularly “us” as in people now called “generation X” as well as the hippie segment of the Boomers who preceded us – had to actually *discover* this stuff through trial and error, and genuinely wrestle with the dawning realization that some of our behavior wasn’t acceptable even if she DID say yes, and we needed to make some changes.

    So I don’t want to get into some dumb inter-generational argument, but try to keep all this in mind when you’re standing there, immersed since birth in the values that we made norms, and thinking about getting sanctimonious because we didn’t adhere perfectly to those values before they were even fully developed.  Trust me, your kids are gonna do the same to you, and in retrospect they’ll have just as much cause.

  • We Are Not “Back Where We Started” With Coronavirus

    Screenshot of CBSNews.Com Headline "Gottlieb says U.S. 'right back where we were' at earlier peak of coronavirus outbreak
    Screenshot of CBSNews.Com headline. Courtesy CBS News.

    One of the headlines I’m seeing quite a bit this morning is former FDA director Scott Gottleib saying we’re “right back where we were.”

    That’s not true.  We’re far worse off.  If we were back where we were, we wouldn’t still be setting new infection records.  But we are.  It’s not like we’re back where we were; where we were was doing something to keep this mess in check.  We were staying home, we were distancing, we were masked.

    Now it’s like we didn’t even do any of that, because of these selfish, obnoxious fools who can’t get it through their heads that it’s not “democratic Governors” closing things down, it’s A DEADLY PANDEMIC VIRUS.  It is real, it is happening, it is killing people, and our president and his supporters are so completely off the rails they think as long as they stomp their feet and insist this isn’t all happening, it won’t be.

    Yes, I said fools. The time for being polite about this has passed.

    Worse Than That

    We’re not “right back where we were,” because where we were was starting to do things right, and we’re not doing that anymore.  Consequently we’re worse off than we were, by far.  We’re seeing record numbers of new infections, the death numbers are rising in correlation.  And when you take out the places that got hit hard early and clamped down much harder, it’s even worse than it looks.

    Image from John Hopkins University showing graphs of coronavirus cases reported daily over time for individual states. You can see an early peak with a dropoff into a long tail, in some cases with a recent slight rise, in states that were hit early and adapted properly. A few experienced a lower early peak. Some troubling cases like Nevada, Florida, and others show a much higher case rate now than at any prior peak.
    States like NY and MI peaked early and even if they have a recent increase it’s not too terrible. States that refused to close entirely in the first place and then re-opened far too soon are setting new records daily.  Courtesy of Johns Hopkins University.

    The simple reality is that we need a relief package NOW. Not a “throw money at them to stop them from rioting” relief package, a comprehensive regular payment to ensure people aren’t dying and losing their homes.

    Unfortunately, it is precisely these people who refuse to cooperate that will eventually cause more draconian measures to be taken to enforce masks, social distancing, and the stay-home orders that I’m quite sure are upcoming again.  This isn’t going to go away because of political arguments; it’s here until a vaccine is found.  I’ve been saying that since day one.  It’s not going away just because we want it to.  Until a vaccine is found be prepared to stay home.

    But The Economy…

    [do_widget id=text-3]

    I frankly don’t care much about landlords and mortgage holders at this point. The stock market doesn’t mean anything to me, nor to most of us.  That’s low-speed money, it doesn’t really do anything but sit around and be shuffled back and forth between service institutions with no value add. We need money going in to the economy, that currently isn’t, to keep goods and services moving. When they stop they tend to be tough to start up again.  We can let the landlords and mortgage holders wait for the moment; that money isn’t going anywhere fast anyway.  Right now people need money in their hands, they need to be able to stay the hell home unless they’re essential, if they’re out they need to be covered, protected and protecting.  We can work funding for maintenance technicians at rental properties and private property later, it’ll hold for a couple of weeks.  Right now, people need money in their hands.

    Ignoring this or pretending it’s not really as bad as it seems is killing innocent people.  We have played enough games with this nonsense. Your anxiety is just one more reason you should be staying home.  If you’re not capable of working in a mask, don’t work.  That’s exactly why the unemployment extensions and modifications are in place. 

    We are at high and growing risk with this virus, and it kills. If you’re not worried about that, that’s on you. But as long as the consequences you reap from that attitude are also mine to bear, you simply don’t have the right to impose that on me and therefore you must either voluntarily stop doing so or be regulated by the government into stopping.

    You WILL stop putting other people’s lives at risk.  It’s not a question anymore.

    The virus doesn’t care if we like it. Doesn’t care that we’re uncomfortable, doesn’t care that we blah blah blah doesn’t care.  Doesn’t care about our pretense that we don’t “believe” it.  What we believe is not relevant to the decision-making process anymore.  Nor is what we “like” or that we’re not “comfortable” with.

    Dying now.

    Dying.

    We don’t argue anymore.  We shut up and do what we need to do to stop the dying, while we do our best to improve the science so we can understand how to properly get things rolling again long-term in the worst case scenario, that being that this simply does not go away until we achieve herd immunity.  At present understanding of the numbers, this entails a minimum of a few million dead just in the US, and the only real question is how long will it take.  This is the current reality.

    Sidebar:  How To Get Herd Immunity

    The idea that speeding up infection rates will somehow provide a solution as we magically get to herd immunity without losing a substantial part of the population is nuts.  The way you get to herd immunity is when some majority percentage of the population has been exposed to the virus, and it has run its course in them.  In the current best case scenario that calculates to about 2 and a quarter million Americans dead in the next fairly short period – year to two years.  It means permanent regulation about social distancing, masking, etc.  It means nobody will ever be safe and every year a few thousand or hundred thousand people will die of this until a vaccine is developed, people who would not have died otherwise.

    That is what people who keep talking about “herd immunity” and “only one percent” and so forth are saying. They are literally saying out loud that they’re willing for a few million people to die for no reason beyond their personal comfort and convenience.  Over a period of decades the death rate will slow, but there’s not enough data to predict reliably by how much until, literally, everyone who is not immune to this disease has caught it and either lived or died….and at this point scientists aren’t even certain that immunity is permanent, as there have been multiple reports of reinfection but unfortunately few with any great reliability.  One prominent and respected immunologist, Danny Altmann of Imperial College, London, recently characterized immunity to Covid-19 as “fragile” and “short-lived.”  So it may well be that there is no vaccine, or that any vaccine would have to be administered on an ongoing basis, probably with more frequency than the flu vaccine.

    Do keep in mind that for those who are effected by coronavirus-related disease, “lived” is a somewhat relative statement.  This disease does some pretty horrible things to the body, the full scope of which is not yet known, but we have seen what appear to be permanent and debilitating injuries to the lungs and heart, in addition to neurological disorders that may or may not be transient.

    Those relying on “herd immunity” arguments are basically saying let’s hurry up and have all those people die so we can be done with this, and we don’t even know if being “done with this” is a thing yet.  The argument is sociopathic insanity and absolutely represents a callous disregard for other human lives.

    We now return you to your regularly scheduled article.

    Back To The Economy

    Congress are going to have to find what little remains of their souls and get a relief package through that MEANS SOMETHING. Canada’s model appears to be pretty successful, and other nations are doing well under similar arrangements. Essentially a UBI will be put in place for the duration. My friend Ellis, who teaches macroeconomics, has been saying for years that we would be heading that direction soon regardless. He didn’t necessarily know it would be due to Covid, but he knew we were going to end up in a UBI situation regardless of whether we tried to or wanted to or not.  The pandemic just pushes us a great deal harder in that direction and makes the solutions more clear and clearly necessary.

    [do_widget id=text-2]

    The pandemic creates a special circumstance window where you can get away with UBI and no job guarantee for a period – a year or so – but that’s not a sustainable model; you have to have one for other to work. We shouldn’t do it at all but we don’t have time to wait for the job guarantee foot-draggers to catch up before we start handing UBI payments.  It’s really no exception to the rules or anything, it’s just that we can agree to take on a bit of a long-term hit to keep ourselves alive in the short term.

    However, that also means we need to be much more ethical and focused on what that long-term hit will look like, because it won’t be us paying for it.  It’ll be our kids and theirs.

    You will note that this is the end of this ridiculous “social Darwinism” / “work ethic” approach to questions of employment, compensation, and so forth; this outrageous notion that a human being must do more than simply be human before they “deserve” the benefits of their humanity. Even our best politicians continue to fall for that, if for no other reason than that they know they’re playing to the working poor, who resent the non-working poor oftentimes more than the wealthy do.

    (This is a key reason that the Powers That Be, the ownership class, are dragging their feet; we’re going to realize soon that we could have been doing all of this a long time ago, and the only reason we didn’t is that someone wanted to make a dollar on it first.)

    The people making the dollars from it definitely don’t want us to notice that, and you’re absolutely right to be angry about it.

    But we’re so wrapped up in old-style thinking, even proto-populist Sanders plays these linguistic games, right? “No working American should have to choose between rent and food.”

    Excuse me, no, that’s the old way.  The new way is no HUMAN BEING should have to make that choice, who cares if they’re “working” or “American?” Why does NOT being either one or both of those things disqualify a human being from having their basic needs met? That’s just wrong, stupid, and insane.

    We have the capacity to do it.

    So why aren’t we?

    Universal Morality Strikes Again

    Well, we’re not doing it so we can feel like we’re better than someone, that’s why. So we can continue to maintain a permanent slave class in the so-called “third world” to provide us with enough cheap electronics to stay anesthetized to our own participation in the oppression of others.

    Isn’t that gross?

    Isn’t it time we stopped doing sick things like that to each other and started working on making sure everyone’s got a fair shot at life?  Isn’t now the time to stop thinking of other human beings as expendable?

    I think it is, and so do a whole bunch of other folks, and that’s the way we’re going to go whether the oligarchs and their lackeys like it or not.  Any other direction violates the universal morality.  So that is the direction we will go.  We can get there the easy way, or the hard way.  Right now the oligarchy is still trying to make it the hard way – so hard that we give up.

    But we don’t give up and we won’t give up because survival and propagation of the species is the only universal morality, and when we find we are violating that morality, we will, even unconsciously, act to end that violation as quickly and effectively as possible.

    Solutions We Can’t Avoid

    The reality that we’re being directed away from is simply this:  capitalism as it is practiced in the United States and some other nations is not merely unsustainable; it is incompatible with the universal ethic.  It ensures a permanent underclass just like any other top-down economic system; after all, if there is a top there must also be a bottom.  As long as that “underclass,” that “bottom,” is beneath the level of not mere survival but dignity and opportunity, it is too low for the species to survive and propagate.  Therefore it violates the universal ethic.

    Thus, the human task before us is to ensure the bottom is high enough that any person who can be capable of it has every possible chance to be their best at whatever they choose to do with their lives.

    Screenshot from SlaveryFootprint.Org showing my results (I own twenty slaves) along with some top-level suggestions on how to reduce that number through consumer pressure.
    Screenshot of my results from SlaveryFootprint.Org.

    That is the only real solution to any of this.  We have to live up to our rhetoric, and we have to start right this minute, and everyone has to participate.

    If we were doing that, this pandemic wouldn’t be hitting us so much harder than it is the rest of the world, we wouldn’t have these egregious abuses of power that drive people into the streets in protest, we wouldn’t be building statues to traitors, rapists, and murderers.  We wouldn’t have a nation of maleducated sociopaths ready to be open fascists, walking around exerting offensive violence when there’s no reasoned or moral basis for their demands to be met.

    Then those same fascists turn around and claim that those who exert defensive violence are doing the same thing, because they’re gaslighting manipulative sociopaths and they think everyone else is stupid enough to fall for that deliberate, willful, and ultimately artificial stupidity.

    For far too long, they’ve been right.

    This cycle has to end, and it has to end today.  If it doesn’t end today then it has to end every today until it ends for tomorrow too.

    None of us are free until all of us are free.

  • We Can’t Be Nice About Any Of This Anymore

    Duh.

    Lately it seems like I’ve been on a bit of a tear, as they say.  There’s been some status messages, and even a short video, all coming back to the core idea we’ve got to stop explaining basic things to people who completely understand them but pretend not to because the pretense allows them to continue engaging in unacceptable behavior.

    I don’t mean to ever discourage reading or genuine intellectual curiosity.  I absolutely believe that understanding what the facts are is critically important, and that of necessity that means understanding what a fact is, is pretty important too. 

    I’m just over the constant going back and forth with people who act like they don’t get it.

    It sucks up too much energy.

    Explaining why black lives matter and what that phrase means when it’s been under public discussion since 2013 is waste of time, as is arguing back and forth over what groups where and why “own” what “interest” in whatever related commercial trademarks there may be and how they’re used and why.  First and foremost the conversation must begin with the basic understanding that black lives matter.  Full stop.  Anything beyond that is nonsense and argument, because anything beyond that means on some level and to some degree you are willing enough to compromise that basic idea to bother arguing about it.

    Same thing with explaining why Confederate statues don’t have any place in the United States, same thing with explaining people why they should wear a mask in the midst of an ongoing deadly pandemic, on and on. We just expend so much time and energy on people not to educate them but to chip away at the idea that their position has some social acceptability, that we can’t ever move forward because these sandbaggers keep siphoning all our energy into just not going backwards any faster.

    Manners?

    Green-shaded map with scaled solors to show which states have more or less difference in gap between average wages for women and men. pay rate.
    The darker colors have smaller gaps; the darkest, the *smallest* gap is about 10% (women make a little over 90% what men do), and the lightest – in Utah, women make less than 70% of men on average.

    Meanwhile women are still making 70 or 80 cents on the dollar, black people are still getting shot by cops on an almost daily basis if not more than daily, there are still thousands of kids in cages in the middle of a global pandemic and we’re doing worse than nothing to help them including losing them entirely.

    I’m really not trying to be rude about it, but at this point who’s more rude here? The person who is continuing to act as though they don’t understand the arguments why human beings should be human beings and we shouldn’t put up statues to people who bought and sold human beings and fought against the interests of human freedom because that is neither honorable nor laudable?  Or the person who says “enough, we’re moving on now?”

    Who’s being more disrespectful, the person who refuses to wear a simple facemask, repeatedly demonstrated to have zero to negligible ill effects, in the middle of a deadly global pandemic that’s already killed at least – depending on your source – 125-130-ish thousand people just in the United States at the time I’m writing this, and probably many more? Or is the person who firmly insists we’re done arguing about it now and have the best guidance possible, and that’s WEAR A MASK WHEN YOU GO OUT, being rude by their firm insistence?   Who dies in which direction?  How many cases are there, EVER, of people dying because they were wearing a mask?  Right.  Wear the damn thing. If you’ve got reason beyond selfish and spurious hypochondria not to, you really WILL have the advice of a doctor because you’ve already got other serious problems.

    In the vast majority of cases that first person is simply not being honest. It’s silly that we keep having to say the same things over and over as if each individual person is always hearing it for the first time. For instance I’m quite sure that my friend’s friend, whose remark started the comment that became this article, has heard all of these arguments before. He just doesn’t want to accept them. He can’t find a reasoned basis in objective fact and ethical behavior to support his position so he just pretends not to understand the arguments against it.  Maybe that’s a conscious decision, maybe it’s not, I don’t know the man well enough to say.  But that’s what’s happening.

    At some level that stops even being about questions of racism or sexism or xenophobia or bigotry, and just starts being about personal character and integrity.  I know people are going to find that offensive and outrageous and insulting, but it’s more offensive and outrageous and insulting to continue to insist that we don’t understand the basic realities of life whenever they’re inconvenient for us.

    Consequences

    Worse, it’s deadly.

    This whole “I don’t get it” game is half the problem in a lot of places right now, where you’re talking about coronavirus or gender issues or racial issues or economic disparity issues or any of it.  Half of any of those problems at least is people who just insist on pretending not to get it because if they admit they understand the arguments they have to admit that they’ve been wrong. Nobody likes to do that, so we’ve developed this elaborate set of communications to justify not doing it.

    That has to stop now. That’s really what all of this is teaching us.

    In another example, there’s a big kerfuffle up the road from me in Allendale, Michigan over the removal of a “confederate statue,” arguably more a civil war memorial featuring a generic confederate soldier.

    That statue, though, was placed in 1998. It’s less historically relevant than The Simpsons, Nirvana, or Baywatch. And, it’s in Michigan. Nobody from this state fought for the breakaway traitorous republic; the statue doesn’t represent anyone who has any sort of tie here.

    But obviously it must be important, after all apparently nobody in that town heard about the Civil War until 133 years after it was over and that’s why we’ve got to keep the statue!

    Top of Allendate, Michigan civil war memorial statue showing a Confederate and Union soldier with their backs to each other looking into the distance in different directions, each carrying a flag that faces the viewer.
    Top feature of Allendale MI civil war memorial statue. Statue photos courtesy reddit.com user u/resister_sister

    No more of that nonsense. It’s dumb, it’s a waste of time, and it’s a bunch of dishonest and disingenuous people complaining about things that don’t even have the slightest significance to them other than having something to complain about.

    In the greater part, right now especially, they are complaining simply because other people whose oppression these people have benefited from for centuries are demanding an end to that oppression.  The loudest subgroup of those voices, those with legitimate grievances that remain ignored, are those who descended from or look like the people who have been largely enslaved and dehumanized throughout the entire history of this country.  And those people are saying “you see this?  This is what we’re talking about!”

    That scares people whose current state of privileged comfort is in some way is a product of their privilege and social standing they were born to and other irrelevancies like their gender or the color of their skin.  They are facing the reality that pretty much their entire way of thinking is wrong and cruel and intolerable and it must stop. They’ve lived so long with privilege, they think they’re entitled to it.  They’re afraid they can’t compete without the advantages privilege brings, against those who have historically been denied those privileges.  So when the oppressed rise up and say “you see this?” the response of the oppressors is “I don’t know what you mean,” and they keep right on going.

    Solutions

    So the privileged are scared again because their privilege is threatened and they imagine that’s a threat to their comfort.  That’s where all this comes from, right, is this stupid zero-sum thinking where in order for me to have, you have to do without.  Some people, most of them simply mislead and others deliberately misleading, push that way of thinking to rationalize their own greed or self-interest above and beyond others. It’s uncomfortable for people who have defined themselves around a core creed to realize that it’s cruel and harmful, not only to those against whom it is directed but also against those who create it and perpetuate it.  They don’t want to change because it’s not comfortable and they think it means they’ll lose something.

    That, my friends, is just too bad.  Those privileged folks are just gonna have to handle themselves, because if they continue behaving that way and treating the problem that way, they may just end up right.  Problem is, so will we all, again, and that crap has to end or we’re going to end.  So the traditionally privileged can just go find find those bootstraps they’re always telling the oppressed to pull themselves up by. Because the world is moving on, with them or without them.

    The truly stupid thing is, it’s not even really “taking away” anything; it’s just making sure other people have access to the same opportunities and “rights” even if they’re *not* born into privilege &c.

    Those people who are afraid they can’t compete on a level playing field rely on the power of their privilege to continuing to sabotage the game.

    Photo of Allendale civil war memorial showing a black child, probably male, crouched between the backs of the legs of the Union and Confederate soldiers, holding a tablet that says "Freedom to Slaves Jan 5 1863."
    All of this is to say nothing of the fact that the statue itself perpetuates the idea that freedom of black Americans is a gift from white men rather than their right as human beings.

    The problem is – and this is why I’ve been saying for years that “kumbaya liberalism is dead” – those same people have learned that they can manipulate the good nature of people who are decent.  They can claim injury where there is none, or ignorance that is really saccharine stupidity, and rely on The Good Guys™ to continue being gentle.

    It’s time we faced the difficult reality that the long term result of that has been a lot of good, dead people and a lot of live crappy ones, and it’s quickly becoming an existential threat to the species.

    As I’ve paraphrased Heinlein so many times: survival and propagation of the species is the only universal morality.  Ultimately, as a totality of human consciousness and existence, anything threatening that single universal morality will be eliminated, one way or another, just as happens with Darwinian selection for any other species, to the greatest extent that can possibly be exerted by that totality.

    What makes that humane and ethically acceptable – or what defines the point at which it becomes so – is the effect of individual human will.  At some level, all else being equal, we can each choose to act in ways that benefit or detract from the universal morality.  “Lower” life forms don’t always have a choice about that.

    In the US and other nations we’ve built entire systems that detract from the sole universal human morality, and we’ve insisted on treating the very things about those systems which detract from that fundamental drive to survive as though they are themselves required for our survival.

    We have, rather than elevating and empowering human life, chosen to subjugate and restrict it for our own material benefit.

    That has to stop, and we can either choose to stop it or the greater will of the collective species will absolutely act to stop it one way or another.

    Conclusions

    When our self-serving idiocy begins to work against the universal morality of other species and we refuse to put an end to it ourselves, those species do their best to fight back.

    When we act against the universal morality of great numbers of species, we act against the universal morality of all life, and all life will work together to ensure we can’t keep doing that.

    This is how all of this crap keeps going on, every bit of it. Including coronavirus, even including an alarming percentage of seismic activity in the last fifty years, to say nothing of the natural disasters that are made worse by our destruction of the environment, and it just keeps going and it all starts with individuals thinking clearly and ethically. Individuals who make a deliberate choice to refuse to at least make the genuine effort to *try* to do either one of those things are making a deliberate choice to die.

    We no longer have the option of first considering the hurt feelings of the privileged.  Especially when it’s mostly adults acting like little kids, being afraid to remove a band-aid and see the healing where a wound used to be.  None of this is really going to “hurt” anybody, beyond the blow to their ego in finding out they’ve got to actually start living up to their own self-image, they’re not allowed to keep faking it anymore.

    The coddling of these egos has to stop, and it has to stop now.  It’s killing us, in very large numbers, and those numbers are going to get larger still before they start shrinking.  Aside from basic human selfishness in the immediate sense, what mostly keeps this going is that arguing over these things is a multibillion dollar industry, and in spite of the generalized damage is inflicts on society as a whole, it props up the power and lifestyles of the ownership class.

    But if we don’t change what we’re doing, NOW, they’re not going to start shrinking until so many people have died that the human population is no longer a threat to the rest of the world or itself.

    We can no longer, as a matter of that universal human morality I keep talking about, continue to be polite to the stupid.  Yes, there are going to be people who genuinely don’t get it, but that’s what education is for.  That’s ignorance and it can be fixed.  I’m talking about stupidity, which is willful ignorance or pretense to it.  There are many more people who get it just fine and pretend not to – they play stupid – like the people who get a fake “emotional support animal” just because they notice people with real ones and are pissed off that someone is getting something “special” and they’re not.

    The protection of these people’s feelings has to end, or it’s going to end us.  It sounds cruel, but it isn’t.  What’s cruel is the price everyone has to pay to keep propping all this BS up.

    Sorry.

  • Support Historical Statues (Fundraiser)

    In light of recent events, all the protesting and complaining about the removal of confederate-themed statuary from various US cities has convinced me that the statue defenders are right.  It’s just plain wrong for a bunch of hand-wringing, pearl-clutching liberal pantywaists to try to remove our glorious history by destroying monuments to a breakaway republic that attempted to destroy the United States in the name of owning people.

    How could anyone possibly be expected to remember the glorious and noble battle to own black people if we don’t have statues of random traitors scattered about our cities?  Why, pretty soon they’ll be tearing down statues of Christopher Columbus and we’ll forget he discovered our beautiful country!  (*He didn’t.  He never set foot in what became the continental United States.  He was also an incredible dick.  And there were plenty of people here when he got here, as the Vikings almost certainly found out five hundred years before Columbus did.)

    So with that in mind, I’ve decided to start a campaign to place this statue of Osama bin Laden in the 200 largest cities in the United States!  Sure, some people might think we’re glorifying a radical terrorist who killed thousands of Americans in an attempt to end the United States – just like those goofy Antifa liberals think that’s what we’re doing with confederate statues – but REAL AMERICANS know the truth:  if we don’t put these statues up, pretty soon people are going to forget all about 9-11 and IT WILL HAPPEN AGAIN!

    TRUE PATRIOTS JOIN NOW!  For your contribution over five hundred dollars, we will inscribe YOUR NAME as a TRUE AMERICAN PATRIOT at the bottom of a statue in the city you select, from the list below:

    New York New York 8,323,340
    2 Los Angeles California 4,015,940
    3 Chicago Illinois 2,694,240
    4 Houston Texas 2,340,890
    5 Phoenix Arizona 1,703,080
    6 Philadelphia Pennsylvania 1,591,800
    7 San Antonio Texas 1,578,030
    8 San Diego California 1,447,100
    9 Dallas Texas 1,382,270
    10 San Jose California 1,033,670
    11 Austin Texas 988,218
    12 Fort Worth Texas 932,116
    13 Jacksonville Florida 926,371
    14 Columbus Ohio 922,223
    15 Charlotte North Carolina 905,318
    16 San Francisco California 896,047
    17 Indianapolis Indiana 875,929
    18 Seattle Washington 783,137
    19 Denver Colorado 734,134
    20 Washington District of Columbia 720,687
    21 Boston Massachusetts 710,195
    22 El Paso Texas 685,575
    23 Nashville Tennessee 673,167
    24 Detroit Michigan 667,272
    25 Portland Oregon 664,103
    26 Las Vegas Nevada 662,000
    27 Oklahoma City Oklahoma 655,407
    28 Memphis Tennessee 647,374
    29 Louisville Kentucky 624,890
    30 Baltimore Maryland 590,479
    31 Milwaukee Wisconsin 585,589
    32 Albuquerque New Mexico 561,188
    33 Tucson Arizona 553,871
    34 Fresno California 538,195
    35 Mesa Arizona 527,666
    36 Atlanta Georgia 523,738
    37 Sacramento California 521,769
    38 Kansas City Missouri 505,198
    39 Miami Florida 486,388
    40 Colorado Springs Colorado 485,946
    41 Raleigh North Carolina 481,958
    42 Omaha Nebraska 470,702
    43 Long Beach California 463,218
    44 Virginia Beach Virginia 447,841
    45 Minneapolis Minnesota 437,069
    46 Oakland California 435,224
    47 Tampa Florida 413,704
    48 Arlington Texas 402,762
    49 Tulsa Oklahoma 396,543
    50 Bakersfield California 390,233
    51 New Orleans Louisiana 390,128
    52 Wichita Kansas 388,771
    53 Aurora Colorado 382,742
    54 Cleveland Ohio 379,233
    55 Anaheim California 352,911
    56 Honolulu Hawaii 342,933
    57 Riverside California 336,285
    58 San Juan Puerto Rico 331,165
    59 Santa Ana California 330,389
    60 Henderson Nevada 330,084
    61 Lexington Kentucky 328,690
    62 Corpus Christi Texas 325,406
    63 Stockton California 316,996
    64 St. Paul Minnesota 311,895
    65 Cincinnati Ohio 306,487
    66 Irvine California 303,956
    67 Greensboro North Carolina 299,946
    68 Pittsburgh Pennsylvania 294,860
    69 Lincoln Nebraska 293,905
    70 St. Louis Missouri 293,792
    71 Orlando Florida 291,739
    72 Plano Texas 288,539
    73 Anchorage Alaska 285,634
    74 Newark New Jersey 282,862
    75 Durham North Carolina 282,737
    76 Chula Vista California 277,289
    77 St. Petersburg Florida 271,842
    78 Jersey City New Jersey 271,099
    79 Fort Wayne Indiana 270,989
    80 Toledo Ohio 270,651
    81 Chandler Arizona 268,675
    82 Laredo Texas 264,703
    83 Madison Wisconsin 264,030
    84 Scottsdale Arizona 262,222
    85 Lubbock Texas 260,823
    86 Reno Nevada 260,258
    87 Gilbert Arizona 258,935
    88 Buffalo New York 255,244
    89 Glendale Arizona 254,500
    90 North Las Vegas Nevada 253,923
    91 Winston-Salem North Carolina 251,762
    92 Chesapeake Virginia 248,106
    93 Garland Texas 246,627
    94 Irving Texas 243,738
    95 Hialeah Florida 243,208
    96 Norfolk Virginia 242,234
    97 Fremont California 239,525
    98 Boise Idaho 234,576
    99 Paradise Nevada 233,689
    100 Richmond Virginia 232,055
    101 Arlington Virginia 231,803
    102 Spokane Washington 223,266
    103 Tacoma Washington 222,603
    104 Modesto California 218,758
    105 Fontana California 218,573
    106 Des Moines Iowa 217,891
    107 San Bernardino California 217,671
    108 Baton Rouge Louisiana 216,701
    109 Frisco Texas 215,060
    110 Salt Lake City Utah 213,367
    111 Moreno Valley California 212,992
    112 Oxnard California 212,715
    113 Santa Clarita California 210,543
    114 Birmingham Alabama 208,940
    115 McKinney Texas 208,487
    116 Port St. Lucie Florida 206,410
    117 Fayetteville North Carolina 205,646
    118 Grand Rapids Michigan 205,289
    119 Glendale California 204,765
    120 Rochester New York 203,792
    121 Huntsville Alabama 202,910
    122 Amarillo Texas 202,028
    123 Huntington Beach California 201,941
    124 Spring Valley Nevada 199,722
    125 Cape Coral Florida 199,503
    126 Tallahassee Florida 199,205
    127 Yonkers New York 199,021
    128 Aurora Illinois 198,870
    129 Grand Prairie Texas 198,442
    130 Akron Ohio 198,148
    131 Little Rock Arkansas 197,371
    132 Montgomery Alabama 197,282
    133 Overland Park Kansas 196,636
    134 Augusta Georgia 196,303
    135 Tempe Arizona 194,218
    136 Sunrise Manor Nevada 192,934
    137 Knoxville Tennessee 191,060
    138 Sioux Falls South Dakota 190,519
    139 Columbus Georgia 189,296
    140 Mobile Alabama 186,804
    141 Ontario California 186,653
    142 Vancouver Washington 186,516
    143 Worcester Massachusetts 186,433
    144 Fort Lauderdale Florida 184,599
    145 Chattanooga Tennessee 184,143
    146 Shreveport Louisiana 183,819
    147 Brownsville Texas 183,748
    148 Peoria Arizona 180,219
    149 Rancho Cucamonga California 180,031
    150 Salem Oregon 179,944
    151 Providence Rhode Island 178,901
    152 Eugene Oregon 178,329
    153 Elk Grove California 177,406
    154 Santa Rosa California 177,132
    155 Newport News Virginia 177,064
    156 Pembroke Pines Florida 177,058
    157 Oceanside California 176,950
    158 Cary North Carolina 175,102
    159 Fort Collins Colorado 172,862
    160 Corona California 171,213
    161 Garden Grove California 170,328
    162 Springfield Missouri 169,552
    163 Alexandria Virginia 165,748
    164 Bayamon Puerto Rico 165,383
    165 Clarksville Tennessee 164,496
    166 Enterprise Nevada 164,314
    167 Hayward California 161,314
    168 Jackson Mississippi 160,080
    169 Lakewood Colorado 158,660
    170 Lancaster California 158,627
    171 Hollywood Florida 158,239
    172 Palmdale California 156,299
    173 Salinas California 155,619
    174 Springfield Massachusetts 155,472
    175 Bellevue Washington 154,647
    176 Killeen Texas 153,973
    177 Kansas City Kansas 153,600
    178 Macon County Georgia 152,519
    179 Sunnyvale California 152,427
    180 Pomona California 152,405
    181 Escondido California 152,245
    182 Pasadena Texas 151,891
    183 Murfreesboro Tennessee 151,066
    184 Naperville Illinois 149,196
    185 Joliet Illinois 148,227
    186 Paterson New Jersey 145,871
    187 Savannah Georgia 145,754
    188 Rockford Illinois 145,020
    189 Midland Texas 145,012
    190 McAllen Texas 144,279
    191 Waco Texas 144,015
    192 Roseville California 143,921
    193 Torrance California 143,912
    194 Thornton Colorado 143,890
    195 Metairie Louisiana 143,481
    196 Miramar Florida 143,219
    197 Bridgeport Connecticut 143,010
    198 Olathe Kansas 142,841
    199 Denton Texas 142,173
    200 Surprise Arizona 142,049

    Act now, we’re limited to only five inscriptions per city!

    (Disclaimer.  This is obviously a joke at the expense of idiots.  However if you would like to contribute to keeping me in a position to continue creating new work, you can find out more about how to do so here.  Thanks!)

  • It’s Not Over. Not Even Close.

    [embedyt] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lSRCcMlTxls[/embedyt]

    Breonna Taylor’s murderers have not been charged. The accessories to that murder are still employed.

    The man who fractured Martin Gugino’s skull is out on bail, along with the only other officer of dozens who witnessed the assault and did nothing.

    We still have an avowed and publicly declared fascist controlling the executive branch, and scores of not-so-publicly declared fascists in Congress, to say nothing of a judiciary that has been filled with rot.

    22 states still have no legal age requirement for marriage, with parental consent – “parental consent” being a mechanism used for thousands of years to legitimize pedophilia.

    8 states still forbid atheists from holding office.

    There are still uncountable millions without health insurance – 44 million *before* COVID, and untold millions more since. Health care is still treated as a benefit of employment rather than a human right.

    Profit interests still hold power – in some cases nearly absolute power – in our prisons and criminal justice system, our schools, our hospitals, and our elections.

    Women still aren’t paid the same as men.

    Thousands of police with records of violence, including both domestic violence and illegal assaults of captives, continue to be employed.

    Nothing, still, has been done to help the over half a million homeless people, including about 18 thousand unaccompanied, unsheltered minors, in this country – again, pre-covid numbers.

    Nothing, still, has been done to help the 38 million Americans living in poverty – pre-covid.

    Legal abortions are still nearly impossible to obtain in vast stretches of our nation.

    Most states still do not have laws requiring mandatory termination of parental rights in cases of rape.

    Hundreds of police officers have walked off their jobs in recent weeks in protest against demands for accountability and transparency related to abuse of police power.

    Thousands of pathetic, cowardly, entitled, overgrown infants continue to terrorize the streets of this nation with terrorist displays of deadly force and threat of violence against any and all who threaten the totalitarian oligarchy these supplicant bootlickers think is going to benefit them as long as they’ve got enough guns and MAGA hats.

    Oh, and in case we’re not noticing, COVID-19’s “second wave” is happening before the first one was over because these same sniveling lickspittles can’t stop kissing their own asses long enough to grasp what “deadly pandemic” means.  It probably doesn’t help that, under the guise of “freedom of speech,” much of the media and even the “president” himself continue to insist it’s not a thing, because if it was they’d lose money.

    The struggle, as they say, is not merely “not over.” It’s barely begun. It’s not going to be easy. Some of us may lose our lives in this struggle, as some of us already have, to say nothing of grievous and permanently disabling injuries at the hands of militarized police and white fascist bigots who have, in at least some cases, been coddled by police rather than properly arrested and charged.

    Some of us will become estranged (or further estranged) from family. Some of us will end marriages. Some of us will lose our livelihoods for speaking out. I personally have been targeted by fake “Antifa” trolls (and they ARE fake, at least one of them is well known to me and has been stalking me for decades) who outed my home address, putting nine other innocent people in danger of violence at the hands of bigots and fascists who might not like what I have to say.

    None of us wants to go through that, and yet…we must. We must because decency and compassion demand it. We must because the very concepts of human freedom and dignity are at stake. We must because until the oligarchy that controls most of the planet is crushed into a bad memory, we are all a moment’s notice away from returning to the darkest of all imaginable dark ages, a world in which all the evils of the past combine with the technology of the future to create a dystopian hellscape that Orwell couldn’t have imagined in his worst nightmares.

    “It has to start somewhere. It has to start sometime. What better place than here? What better time than now?”

    We MUST keep fighting.  MUST.  It’s been a minute since anyone in this country had to truly and seriously consider whether they’re willing to risk their lives to uphold and advance the cause of human decency, compassion, and dignity; to wonder if they might just end up being a martyr for the causes of justice, equality, prosperity, and peace.

    That time is now.  That place is now.  We who cherish genuine freedom and who seek genuine progress are looking directly into the eye of our moment in history.  One hundred years from now, either this moment will be taught as the moment when we finally decided to start living up to our own hype…or it won’t be taught at all.

  • Five Bad Arguments That People Use All The Time

    There’s a lot of bad argumentation on the internet, that’s no secret.  More ways have been invented to insult your mother in the last ten years than ever previously existed, thanks to the social media.

    You find a lot of arguments and bickering, and that too is a tired observation.  What’s not so tired, though, is noting the overuse, misuse, and fallacy of some “points” that come up time and time again.

    It’s time to rid ourselves of these five “arguments.”  Generally speaking, they serve little to no positive purpose, except as an attempt by the person making these arguments to establish dominance in the conversation.

    You don’t want to be that person.

    So here’s five clichéd non-arguments that you can eliminate from your linguistic repertoire, and in so doing, you’ve done a little bit to make the world a little less stupid.  Thanks for that.

    (A note:  attentive readers may think this article looks familiar; it’s a re-work of a piece I originally posted back in 2013.)

    5. “Name calling means you lose”

    Nonsense.  If I think you’re a jerk and I say so, nothing has been “lost” except perhaps the comfortable, criticism free bubble in which you live.

    Of course, that rebuttal is no less oversimplified than the original assertion.  The reality – as so often happens – is that this is a case-by-case situation.  If you think you’re making some profound political statement by referring to the president as “Barry” or always including his middle name when you talk about him, or if your discourse regularly includes words like “libtards” or “repukes,” then it’s a pretty safe bet that you don’t really have anything to say.

    On the other hand, if you are espousing/promoting a hateful, ignorant ideology, it does not make the slightest difference to the (in)validity of that ideology if I point out that it’s hateful and ignorant.  It doesn’t add validity to your ideology if I tell you that you’re a greedy, selfish asshole for promoting it.  Jeffery Dahmer does not suddenly become a martyr because I say he’s a dick.  This is silly schoolyard nonsense that adds nothing to the conversation except a clear statement that the person making this assertion is desperately trying to control it.

    4. “You Mentioned Hitler; You Lose”

    Also, with all due respect to Mike Godwin, not nearly as iron-clad a conversation stopper as people like to think.  While it’s certainly true that buzzwords like “nazi,” “communist,” “socialist,” and others are often employed as ad hominem attacks with no real bearing on the subject at hand (and often a manifest ignorance as to what those words actually mean), it’s also entirely reasonable to point out when someone is making a suggestion or drawing a parallel that is uncomfortably reminiscent of the Nazi ideology.  For instance, some idiot bigot on some forum or the other that I was recently reading made a remark to the effect that homosexuals should be imprisoned and subject to any and all manner of “examination” to determine what “went wrong.”  Besides the obvious logical flaw (who says anything “went wrong?”), in reality this statement reminded me strongly of Dr. Mengele’s horrific human experimentation during the Nazi years which included gross violations of the rights and dignity of thousands of gays, Jews, Roma, and even included invasive and in some cases fatal research on twins.

    I made a remark mentioning Mengele, and suddenly it’s all about how I “lost.”  I didn’t “lose” anything, nor was I trying to “win” anything.  I was trying to draw the writer’s attention to the nature of what they were defending, and to make the larger point that this sort of passive-aggressive enabling is exactly how oppression is empowered.  What enabled Mengele wasn’t some secret and obscure distortion of his psyche, although there were plenty of psychological issues there.  But what allowed him to get away with it simply an extension of the same crap you hear every day:  the deliberate dehumanization of various groups of people.

    You see it constantly – consider how we refer to undocumented immigrants as “illegals,” for instance.  They’re not people anymore, certainly not living breathing human beings with dreams and hopes and aspirations and a rich and complex emotional life, because if they were then those of us who choose to regard them as sub-human might have to actually stop acting like assholes.

    Mr. Trump, being what he is, has not only encouraged this way of thinking but given those who engage in it a false sense of social approval and acceptance, which is why it’s become so prevalent in the last three years (and it wasn’t exactly uncommon before that).

    To some extent, any such grouping or pigeonholing is an exercise in the same behavior.  Reducing everyone to “libtards” or “teabaggers” is rooted in the same place.  This expression is pernicious and devious and nearly ubiquitous; consider how so many of these labels are used to depersonalize individuals and hold them accountable for the imagined misdeeds of their imagined co-conspirators.  Consider how words like “thug,” “urban,” or “ghetto” are all commonly used euphemisms in mainstream media for “black,” particularly “poor young black men.”  Consider the phrase “migrant laborer.”  I promise you, even if you can’t admit it to yourself, that when you read that phrase the picture that came into your head was of a Mexican – not a “Latino,” a “Mexican.”  And now when I say “This is Joe, he’s a migrant laborer,” there’s a whole set of attributes that goes with that phrase, which you have now just imparted to Joe.  You even have a picture in your head, right now, of what Joe probably looks like…and you and I both know that Joe looks like a guy with dark skin, black hair, probably a little short, probably not dressed in expensive clothes, probably not driving a new car.

    Joe looks like that because that’s what you’ve been trained to think a “migrant laborer” looks like.  You were trained that way because someone, somewhere decided it was to their advantage that you think that way.  Someone decided Joe would be a lot easier to oppress if you could be made to forget that Joe is a human being who loves his wife and kids and has insecurities and worry and gastrointestinal distress and runny noses and enjoys a good joke.  If you can forget about Joe and just deal with “migrant laborer,” then Joe isn’t a fellow human anymore; he’s a usurper and a thief driving around the country in a low-rider with 85 of his cousins in the trunk.  Rather than a person, he’s a racist stereotype.

    This behavior wasn’t invented by Mengele; he just used it as an excuse to go a couple of horrific steps further.  After all, these are “not really people,” so there’s no ethical qualms about experimenting on them, right?  See also:  The Tuskeegee ExperimentsCalmette-Guerin (experimental testing of a TB vaccine on infants of First Nations tribes in Canada, which actually happened prior to Mengele’s ascension in the Nazi party), or the Eugenics Board of North Carolina, among many others.  (The latest, this Florida man who didn’t understand why he was being arrested for killing a guy who came to his door, telling police he didn’t see what the problem was because he’d “only shot a n—-r.”  See?  Not a person anymore – an archetype, a symbol, an icon, a representative member of a predefined sub-human class.)

    While it’s important to avoid casual comparisons to the horrors of the Holocaust, it’s also important to remember that one of the biggest things which allowed the Holocaust to happen is that people by and large refused to call out oppressive actions and attitudes.  One of the ways this was enabled was by depersonalizing the victims.  They are “only Jews,” they are “only homosexuals,” they are “only midgets,” they are “only twins,” they are “only gypsies (Romani),” they are “only [anything but Aryan],” so why should the ethics which apply to human experimentation, apply to these groups which are obviously not human?  VERY dangerous road to toddle down, it’s a slippery slope from step one.

    3. You’re Intolerant Because You Dislike My Intolerance, Therefore You Lose

    Another classic bit of nonsense from the peanut gallery.  My refusal to put up with you being a stupid bigot does not mean I’m “intolerant,” it means I refuse to put up with stupid bigots.  I also refuse to put up with axe murderers, but that doesn’t make me “intolerant.”  It makes me somewhat less likely to fall victim to an axe murderer.

    This is a favorite refuge of stupid bigots who are desperately clinging to the idea that their stupid bigotry is not actively, visibly dying out in our lifetimes; that being a bigot is still something people can do and expect to live without consequences for it.

    You can try all you want to pretend that’s the same thing as “refusing to put up with blacks” or “refusing to put up with homosexuals” or whatever your thing is, but in the end this line of argument leaves out two things:

    1. You choose to be a bigoted prick.  You weren’t born that way.  For any adult to behave or believe in such a manner, as an adult or even a reasonably intelligent older child you have to make a decision to ignore all of the facts and logic and reason which clearly suggest that bigotry is stupid.
    2. Nobody is hurting you by being gay or black or whatever.

    As my friend Pope Snarky pointed out so succinctly, tolerating intolerance is not itself an act of tolerance; it is an act of passive-aggressive intolerance.  It’s the behavior of the bigot who has enough ego to worry that being a bigot will have negative social repercussions, but not enough actual character to stop being a bigot.  So, with their hands “tied” by public perception, they have to sit back and live vicariously through the stupid bigots who are ridiculous and delusional enough to think that their behavior is acceptable anywhere outside of their circle of bigoted friends.

    2.  I Don’t Like The Source, Therefore The Information Is Wrong, Therefore You Lose

    I’ve burned myself on this one several times.  A few years ago, one of those half-ass “liberal” “news” sites ran an article about the gathering of several fairly unhinged individuals to basically take over a small Pennsylvania town where a very unhinged individual – who happens to be the Chief of Police – was faced with a 30-day suspension for being a stupid douchebag.  Instead of taking it like a person of honor and maybe even getting the hint that his cro-magnon chest-thumping is not appropriate or acceptable behavior for a nine year old child (let alone for a man charged with the duty of protecting a small town), he doubled down and did even stupider, more insane things until he got his ass fired.

    My mistake was that I initially blew the story off because I knew the source was garbage clickbait that tended to lie a lot in their headlines.

    Turns out that, aside from the predictably salacious, hysterical headline, the clickbaiters had the gist of the story right – that a bunch of yobbos with guns had shown up in this small Pennsylvania town for the express purpose of terrorizing both citizens and local government into backing down.

    I blew it, because I looked at the source first.

    This isn’t to say that you should believe everything you read.  It’s not to say that when someone quotes a “News of the World” or “New York Post” or “Washington Times” article that you should assume that person is well-informed about media quality or that the story itself isn’t either made up from whole cloth or grossly distorted from one core fact.

    However, if I’d taken a second to check the story out I would have seen that (as usual) this particular site was just rehashing reports from actual news organizations, and saved myself the embarrassment of having to publicly admit that I blew it.  So before you jump to point out that this paper or that one is junk, remember this one key reality:

    The National Enquirer broke the story of John Edwards’ affair.

    Obviously that doesn’t mean that I should stop thinking of “breaking news” in the context of many sites as more like “broken news,” but it does mean that I should check out legitimate information sources before assuming that any story – even a Fox News Exclusive – is entirely wrong.

    1.  Taking Offense At My Offensiveness Is Violating My Rights!

    There’s a little aphorism that floats around in various forms and guises, which basically says that if I’m offended about something, then it’s my choice to be offended and what I’m really doing is acting like a cheap bully that’s trying to control the conversation.

    So next time someone claims that you’re some kind of terrible person for being offended at their racial or gender or sexuality stereotypes, and you ought to stop being a bully and trying to tell them what they can and cannot say, just find an offensive joke that you know they’ll take personally and for them to get offended…and then use their own argument against them.  “What, now you’re going to try to tell me what I can and can’t say?  How dare you!  What are you, some kind of nanny-state liberal treehugger who wants to tell me what I’m allowed to think is funny?  You’re just choosing to be offended because you want to dictate what I can and cannot say, it’s not me that’s offensive, it’s that you are choosing to take offense so you can bully me into silence.

    If they can’t figure out that their reasoning is entirely invalid after that, you’re either dealing with a complete idiot, or with a troll who doesn’t actually care about making a meritorious argument.  In either case, they can safely be dismissed and you need no longer waste time trying to have an intelligent conversation with them.

    Bonus Round: You Lose!

    This, the careful reader will note, is the common fallacy to all of these arguments.  The phrase “you lose” and the attitude that lies beneath it are clear indicators that the person making the argument isn’t really trying to engage in a discussion at all; they’re trying to engage in a competition.  They don’t want to learn, they want to “win,” which is of course entirely pointless in any genuine exchange of ideas.  If you’re getting involved in a discussion to “win” something, you’re turning it into a battle, instead of a conversation.  The only way to truly win that game is to not play it in the first place.

  • Cutting Education Funding Is Wrong (2011)

    Another of those subjects that just refuses to go away because the fascists we’ve allowed to take part in our government know that keeping us stupid is their best weapon.

    The sound quality on this really stinks, I’m afraid, and I don’t know why. Unfortunately all the source video has been lost to the inevitable costs of poverty, but if it’s that tough to hear feel free to DM me via FB or Twitter and I’ll go ahead and transcribe it here.

    What’s interesting about this video to me is that it inadvertently documents one of those “things I never do,” in this case working with Eric Byler and a group of fellow students who eventually called ourselves “Michigan’s Future” (clearly reflective of my traditionally-aged colleagues!) at Western Michigan University to get a resolution passed by the local city council that they would refuse to enforce any attempt at creating an Arizona-style “show your papers” law. I’m pretty bad about documenting the things I do; in this case it turns out that I did, and totally forgot. You also see legendary Kalamazoo city council member Don Cooney speaking at a pro-education rally, among other things; Don turns up again in a documentary I did about the Occupy movement.

  • Land Of The Lost (2009/2011)

    This is where a lot of things started for me. In 2009 I was invited by some “friends” to move to California. Turned out they were expecting me to service the lady of the house, which I was not really up for. When said lady carved my name into her chest, it was time to go. I’ve never told that part of the story until now.

    This video was recorded while I was on the streets in Woodland, CA in 2009, and originally published in 2011. It’s fair to say I’ve never really recovered, and as I write this in 2023 find myself again on the streets. It’s not easy to watch, but the folks who care about that sort of thing aren’t reading this site anyway.